![]() ![]() ![]() The weighted validity scales method was robust enough to account for “emotional distress” and still identify invalid MMPI-2 performance. The exception is with those scales developed. The clinical interpretations in this text are based upon interpretations generated from the original MMPI scale elevations. ![]() The findings support the need for multiple validity scales to be examined in determining a valid profile. MMPI-2 and different two and three point clinical scale elevations (Lewak et al., 1990). The overall finding showed 100% specificity and 86% sensitivity. In a group of knowledgeable actors (malingerers), 86% was correctly classified. The findings of this study suggest that chronic pain patients in litigation produce a different profile on the MMPI-2 validity scales than do nonlitigants. ![]() The weighted method was able to correctly classify 100% of nonlitigants, using a cutoff score of ≥5. The MMPI-2-RF was constructed using a similar rationale used to create the Restructured Clinical (RC) Scales. Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2) Extended Score Report. The current study examined a method of combining seven different validity scales of the MMPI-2 into a common weighted method in assessing malingering in chronic pain patients. psychometrically and theoretically fine tune the measure 5 The MMPI-2-RF contains 338 items, contains 9 validity and 42 homogeneous substantive scales, and allows for a straightforward interpretation strategy. When the Clinical, Supplementary, and Content scales and subscales are interpreted together, at least three seemingly meaningful scores will be found in 47.4% of perfectly normal individuals, and five or more scales that appear to be clinically significant can be expected in 30.1% of cases that are actually unremarkable.There have been numerous methods developed for the detection of valid profiles on the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI)-2. The normal incidence of at least one apparently abnormal score was 38.3% on the Content and 55.1% on the Supplementary scales. 36.8% of normal adults are likely to obtain a score that would otherwise be considered clinically significant at 65T on one or more of the 10 Clinical scales. MMPI-2 standardization data were re-sampled using Monte Carlo simulations to estimate the base rate of apparently abnormal scores expected by chance in the normal population when multiple scales are interpreted. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |